Enough with the immodesty promoting blog posts….

July 9, 2017
This guy knows whats up, and he CARES about the souls of women. I wish all men were so moral and charitable.

It happened, again. Summer is so hard for upright women of God like myself. It is filled with selfish men who disregard the souls of biologically driven women so that they might wear whatever they please. Women are only responding naturally, the way God made them. This is not their fault.

Note the strategically placed overnight bag intended to make you think about sex!
Note the strategically placed overnight bag intended to make you think about sex!

Mass was a minefield. Men wearing tight pants that draw the eyes to their posteriors. You’re telling me they aren’t advertising something? You’re telling me they aren’t trying to make me desire them? I don’t believe anyone could be so naive. Why else would they dress like that? IF they didn’t want me to look, they would make themselves frumpy and grandfatherly. No, these men are attempting to provoke sin. They are disregarding the souls of women for the sake of fashion. Could anything be more sinful and uncharitable?

It’s like if I struggle with kleptomania, obviously any of the shop owners in town that allow their shops to remain open are in a state of sin because they are leading me to sin. Why is this so hard to grasp!?

Men should be asking their wives before they leave the house, “is this modest? Does this make you think lustful thoughts?” Wives should have the final say since only they know what goes on in the mind of a woman, particularly teenage girls.

Look at them. They literally have no control over their reactions.
Look at them. They literally have no control over their reactions.

Have you ever actually seen the bedroom of a teenage girl? They are so flushed with hormones that they wallpaper their rooms with “Belieber” posters and other men in various stages of attire! This is real! This is biological! Women are physically not able to just look away. Their hormones are raging! We need to have charity toward them. We need to stop being so selfish. It’s fashion. SOULS ARE AT STAKE!

Does it really matter if a man leaves the house intending modesty? No, it matters if he incites lust, and he needs to concern himself with the souls of the women around him! We can’t control the thoughts of others, but we can control what we wear. Men need to start throwing women a bone, instead of just crying foul when a woman howls at them or gives them a stare down. Would you really be wearing that second button unbuttoned if you didn’t want others to know about your assets? That’s what I thought. Pigs!

Shemar, we see you, and we upright women will not be taking your bait...Ok, maybe just a glance...
Shemar, we see you, and we upright women will not be taking your bait…Ok, maybe just a nibble…

I yearn for a time such as we had prior to the 1930’s when men were not allowed to trapse around without a top in public. They flaunt their nippled chests and stomachs with impunity today, and all so that they can “go swimming and have fun.” You better believe they are asking to be grabbed and oogled. They are basically wearing underwear in public. They only difference is the fabric. Would you wear your underwear in front of another woman?! They mean to give us BEDROOM THOUGHTS.

They will get no sympathy for me if they are victimized! They should know by now this is a woman’s world and women have hormones and drives. We can’t be expected to just look away and think about something else. That is ridiculous. That’s not how God made us.

This guy knows whats up, and he CARES about the souls of women. I wish all men were so moral and charitable.
This guy knows whats up, and he CARES about the souls of women. I wish all men were so moral and charitable.

I hope for the day when men dress with dignity. Modesty isn’t only about covering our bodies. It’s is about revealing your dignity! These men need to see their innate dignity and stop wearing the equivalent of underwear or asset accentuating suits in public.

Let us all pray for these lost men who have no idea the effect they have upon women, that they may see the error of their ways and the beauty of puritanical modesty. Amen.


Are you condemning evil or contributing to it?


We MUST speak out against clear evil. We always must, even if it upsets people and even when no one wants to hear it; however, we must resist another related evil.
We must resist the evil that is seeing ourselves as holy and upright because we boldly and bravely condemn evil.

We must not fall prey to the temptation to be cruel and malign other sinners simply because we are not guilty of the sin they commit. We must not give in to the temptation to purposefully be offensive because we believe anti-political correctness a virtue. Rudeness is not of God. His followers are meek and kind, full of grace.

Do not accept the truth in such a way that it allows Satan to sit between your heart and the truth, distorting the message turning you bitter, hateful, and arrogant. Satan doesn’t fear you having the truth. He fears you disseminating it with charity and compassion, for who would be turned from that truth?

Yes, we must have compassion. Compassion is not “being nice” or “not being offensive” but to suffer with someone. It is co-suffering. You cannot suffer with someone whom you do not know or with whom you have not spent any time. You cannot co-suffer with someone whom you are busy wounding.

The Pharisee did not mistake Jesus for condoning the sin of the sinners with which he spent time, and likewise you to can go out as salt and light preaching a message of truthful love and understanding. No one is converted by prideful grandstanding and vitriolous judgement.

Beat your chest before the chests of other wounded sinners, “mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!”


25 comebacks to family size comments

It never fails. A complete stranger will come up and the first question they ask you is about your sex life. The world is full of “creepy todds”…

They ask if you are done, if you know where babies come from, and if you are getting sterilized now. They ask anything and everything they want, because you are now in the subhuman class of people who decided to welcome children freely from God! Shame on you!


To make it a little easier to endure, I give you a list of my favorite (snarky and best left unsaid) comebacks to questions about family size. Use them at your own risk!

1. Congratulations! You are the 10th person to say something about the kids today! Please accept this free baby on our behalf!

2. Yes, we know where babies come from now and we won’t be drinking the municipal water, ANYMORE!

3. What do you mean am I done? They are so fun! Are your children not awesome?

4. Shhh…they aren’t really all mine. I have a rare form of kleptomania which causes me to snatch children.

5. We keep saying we are going to stop, but my husband/wife is just so attractive, THAT JINXY MINX!

6. Well, they are all MINE, but my husband is only the father of about half of them…shhh!

7. No, I don’t know where they come from, and it’s been making me crazy! Do you have time to explain it to me?

8. Fixed? Why? I’m not broken like your head seems to be….

9. Well, I really want a reality show, and my husband loves free child labor, so I think we will keep going!

10. Did you seriously just ask me about my sex life? I have mace.

11. If you worried as much about (insert neglected interest of conversant ie. school) as you do my family size, you would have (insert extreme achievement such as attending Yale), by now. (Best for the nonstop, repeat commenter! Don’t throw down this kind of snark to the innocent first timer!)

12. Jesus said “let the children come to me”.

13. Got to keep my government benefits coming somehow!

14. We value family and God’s will over money, so probably…

15. Some people have all the luck!

16. I have found favor with the Lord, amiright?!

17. They aren’t really mine, I just enjoy taking a ton of kids to the grocery store for fun! It’s the latest Olympic sport, and I am going to qualify this year.

18. Are you kidding? Do you see how perfect I am? There simply MUST be more of me!

19. Why? Do you want to buy one? We’re having a buy one, get one half off sale!

20. Got to keep the man tied down somehow!

21. Well, if I stop, my husband might make me get a job!

22. Shh! I’m building an evil empire!

23. I have a bad habit of misplacing them, so I wanted to have spares.

24. Yes, I order them off of Amazon during their Black Friday sale!

25. What? I don’t know who these people are! Security! CALL SECURITY!!!

Please post your favorite lines in the comments 😀 (Yes, I know I’m snarky…I had a baby keeping me up all night! 😉


Did Pope Francis OK Contraception?



Short answer: No

Long answer: Still no, bruh.

What it boils down to is contraception is intrinsically evil, avoiding pregnancy is not intrinsically evil, and the the effects of the Zika virus (or larvicides depending on your source) could be very bad. OK, moving forward with these premises, the AP article quotes him saying:

Abortion “is an evil in and of itself, but it is not a religious evil at its root, no? It’s a human evil,” he said. “On the other hand, avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil. In certain cases, as in this one (Zika), such as the one I mentioned of Blessed Paul VI, it was clear.”

The church has and will always say that in good circumstances AVOIDING PREGNANCY is the moral choice. One needn’t have a whole gaggle of children they cannot care for just #becauseJesus. That isn’t what the church teaches. Now, does the need to avoid pregnancy mean that you can use an intrinsically evil method? No, of course, not.

99% reliable Natural Family Planning methods such as Billings, Creighton, or Marquette would be perfectly reliable and morally licit. Mother Teresa’s nuns instructed women with 98% reliability how to use NFP in rural India.

NFP =/= Rhythm Method. That is misinformation. I, myself, used NFP to place THREE WHOLE years between my children. I have been married five years and have two planned children. I know several women on the pill who can’t say that. The argument that NFP isn’t reliable is just fallacious. It requires some self discipline, but I would argue most people could use a good dose of that anyhow!

Lastly, while this Pope Paul VI incident he references is spoken about time and time again by many sources, there are no official documents showing this occurred. The permission would have had to have been given in writing in his time. Until a document can be produced, I inclined to believe it is simply bad folklore.

Moreover, if it could be shown this DID occur, it would not be proof he did not make a mistake and would not be the same as the Zika situation. Unmarried, chaste nuns are not contracepting normal marital relations, and taking contraception is not in itself morally evil. It is the action the contraceptive causes in conjugal relations that is evil. Ultimately, this would not have been an infallible move, much how even if Pope Francis told people to use contraception, which he did not. It would not be infallible. It doesn’t work like that.

Ok, so to recap:

AVOIDING PREGNANCY = OK, but contraception is not the moral or Christian way to do it.

Remember kids, when in doubt, no sex = no babies!

Pax Vobiscum, Nerds!