Special Episode: #ThisCatholicGirl Scandal and my favorite REAL Catholic Twitter Accounts!
For referencing what happened, here is the original post by Chase in Patheos:
The Catfishing of the Catholic Community
Special Episode: #ThisCatholicGirl Scandal and my favorite REAL Catholic Twitter Accounts!
For referencing what happened, here is the original post by Chase in Patheos:
The Catfishing of the Catholic Community
So, the Sovereign Pontiff isn’t really your flavor of Pope? I know, I know! Before you interject, “This is about Truth!” let me speak. I, too, am not always a fan of his relationship with the media, particularly the American media. Often, what he has said will be twisted beyond the point of recognition. When we say he is misleading less knowledgable Catholics, we have to consider a few things: it is not solely him that is giving the wrong impression, these Catholics have a moral obligation to rightly form their consciences, and even when we do not feel we must respect the man holding the office, we must always respect the chair of Peter.
It scarcely will be a week between episodes of the media proclaiming that Pope Francis has overturned another Catholic doctrine or Dogma. About half of the time, he has been misquoted or badly translated, and about half the time, he is speaking freely and colloquially, in casual conversation – hardly infallible. What we need to consider is, while no other Pope has spoken to the media as much as Francis, no other Pope lived in the world he lives in, right now. Pope Paul VI didn’t have Instagram. He did not have people reporting his every fall, literally, in photo, tweet, and post. For this, we must consider, that perhaps even the most favorable Pope could have said something unclear from time to time, just no one recorded it.
I do not at all mean to say that he should not be more aware of the power of his words and interactions. That he should, but he is fully aware that he will bear the weight of the sin which he leads others to, as their shepherd. So, too, will those involved in misinterpreting his messages and misguiding his flock. This is a sobering thought, but at the same time, it is comforting that justice will always be served. We mustn’t concern ourselves with being the judge of the Vicar of Christ. We must pray for him. Consider this, the next time you wish to speak uncharitably and harshly toward him, physically harming the pope is one of a very short list of actions which invoke immediate excommunication. Do you imagine that verbal abuse or assault is likely to sit well with God, either? If you feel you must speak out against misguidance, do so with the utmost respect and charity.
Many well meaning and devout Catholics, myself included, worry about the effect these misguidances will have on the general public and dissident Catholics, but I think we are missing a greater picture. The type of person who is getting their Catholic information from the Huffpost is not someone who is probably living the faith, anyhow. Pope Francis has a way or charism if you will, of drawing the public eye to the church. Do we want these people who haven’t considered or been in communion with the church for years or decades, to look at the church and see a diverse range of people all living for God and loving one another, or do we want them to see a juvenile, MMA style, cage-fight between the “rad trads” and the “heretics?”
Trust in the Lord! If He brought me in, He can bring anyone into the church. Sometimes all the Lord needs to soften our hearts, is for us to take a second look at the church. Francis does a good job of interesting people who would otherwise not even glance at it. Acceptance of the fullness of truth comes with time. We must allow people on different journeys, the space to mature, grow, and develop in their faith. We will not attain perfection here, not even you!
Finally, we must always respect the chair of Peter. Christ gave Saint Peter the keys to the Kingdom, and He gave the keys to a mere fisherman who had denied him THREE TIMES, despite personally knowing Him and seeing miracles. Getting it right or being moral 100% of the time, is not a prerequisite of the papacy. The Borgias and many other’s have shown us this. We must marvel at the great wonder that is the survival of the church! Man has certainly tried to run her into the ground, corrupt her, scatter her, and still, she goes onward, bringing Jesus Christ to every man or woman who would have Him. Rest easy O, disgruntled one! The Church survived the Borgias, and she will survive Francis, too. #CardinalSarah4Pope
Pax Vobiscum, and don’t forget to check out the Podcast, This Catholic Life, on iTunes and Stitcher!
It never fails. I mention the fact that I have quite a collection of impressive tattoos, and the person will retort, “What?! You? You have tattoos….but you’re sooooo Catholic/Christian!” This is the point where I usually make my blank, are-you-kidding-me face. To this day, the church has made no pronouncements on tattoos or their moral standing, aside from the Catholic Council of Northumberland in 786, which stated a Catholic bearing a tattoo “for the sake of God” was deemed worthy of praise. Obviously, they can be sinful, but also, they can be morally licit, even sanctifying, as in my case. Why does it’s moral status even matter? I’ll tell you why.
The Pew Research Center survey found that 36 percent of Americans ages 18–25 have a tattoo, 40 percent of those 26-40, and 10 percent of those 41-64. That’s a nice chunk of people, and with 1 in every 7 people on earth being Catholic, it’s a safe bet that some of these tattooed people are Catholic.
So, what can we say about the morality of tattoos? Motivation can make tattoos sinful. Are you doing it to spite someone? Are you doing it because the image, whatever it is, is taking the place of God in your life? Is it offensive or counter-catholic? Does this tattoo in someway, disfigure or mutilate your body’s purpose and innate dignity? These could all be reasons a tattoo would not be morally licit, according to the church teaching.
Caption: This watercolor tattoo is a powerful
reminder of the great migration and struggle
of my grandparents to come to the US
and to bring our family freedom and faith.
Some parties argue that all tattoos are banned in Leviticus 19:26. They forget that immediately after that, in Leviticus 19:27, shaving your beard is banned, as well. This is a great demonstration of how relevant the pronouncements in Leviticus are to the modern Christian or Catholic. That is, they aren’t.
This isn’t to say that the Levites did not have good reasons, in their time. The most probable reason they had for banning tattoos was that they desired to distinguish themselves from pagan tribes in many ways, including circumcision and dietary restrictions. Other proposed reasons are that tattooing with the cremains of dead relatives was a practice in pagan tribes, and the very real threat of infection and death would not have allowed tattooing to be done without great personal risk.
See? Leviticus wasn’t all crazy! Having said this, we are not bound anymore to this Levitical law, than we are to the Levitical belief that wearing braids makes you a harlot or that you can’t shave your beard or eat rare meat.
Some would argue that permanence is the issue, yet, I would argue that our God is a God of permanence. We receive indelible marks in baptism, confirmation, and in other sacraments, albeit invisible ones. God asked the Jews to circumcise themselves, which is both invasive, as far as body modifications go, and permanent. It even risked infection given the primitive times, so I don’t think we can argue God is against permanent body modification completely, even ones that dramatically alter someone as circumcision is in fact, a dramatic modification.
Caption: My coat of arms of the Holy See.
This has gotten me through many a dark times.
Further for your consideration, many permanent body modifications are common place in western culture, and we do not even see them as such. Teeth whitening, removal of wisdom teeth, braces, plastic surgery, implants, fillers, waxing, laser eye surgery, hair cutting and coloring, trimming of nails, removal of hair on the face and eyebrows, eye color implants, and more, are part of the slew of the possibly permanent things done to the body. Many of these are no more cosmetic than a tattoo and equally unnecessary. Now, there are groups which completely eschew cosmetics of any kind, such as the Amish. At least, they are consistent! A woman with make-up, whitened and straightened teeth, colored hair, and nicely shaped eyebrows, scoffing at tattoos might be considered a hypocrite by some.
It is not objective to single out tattooing because your culture is biased against this particular modification or sees it as a taboo, only for sailors and prostitutes. That may be a real association in the “baby boomer” anglosphere, but it does not reflect the reality of tattoos. An argument against tattoos, can rarely, not also be used against cutting your hair, makeup, and ear piercings. Something does not become sinful simply, because it is permanent, or marriage would be sinful. It’s also, permanent.
I have heard of devout and respected Christians saying that they will disown their children, if they get a tattoo/piercing. What kind of Christian love is that? What kind of message does that send? You are only my child, so long as your body looks how I think it should look? People should be more concerned with how they are treating one another, which is something they should control, than their adult childrens’ appearances, something they should not control. In the end, it’s a superficial topic about which parents are notorious for making profound and hurtful statements. No good can come of such treatment.
This is a narrow and uncultured view of tattoos. The church is Catholic, with catholic meaning “universal”. The church runs the gamut from expressive charismatics to silent cloistered nuns to traditional Latin mass attendees to Divine Liturgies in the East. It is very exclusive and judgemental to assume that because something does not suit you or your brand of faith, that it should not and cannot suit another or that it is sinful. I remember upon conversion, feeling very unsure if I could be a good Catholic because the people surrounding me did not have tattoos or piercings or funny colored hair. I felt like this strange outlier. Silly me! The church is universal. It encompasses people of every walk of life.
Caption: White ink “Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus”.
Blessedly, in her wisdom, the universal church has not even remotely tried to legislate the view point of a small, puritanical subset of the global church. There are many tribal cultures where tattooing is a right of passage and a social norm, unrelated to religion. There are many cultures in Latin America where it is not seen as a moral question, at all. Many, many Catholics in Mexico can be found proudly displaying gorgeous depictions of their patron, Our Lady of Guadalupe. There are cultures who change the shapes of their heads, lengthen their necks, wear extensive and colorful make-up, and stretch their lips, without depriving the body of original function. It is completely possible for someone with an elongated neck to be a good Catholic, just as it is possible for someone with a tattoo to be, as well.
But, what about Chinese foot binding, you exclaim! As a female descendant of women who suffered foot binding, this is an ideal modification to use to make a distinction. This modification was not morally licit because it deprived the body part of its original function, use, and inflicted unspeakable pain on women. This would be mutilation, or more actually, forced mutilation, as it began when girls were between 3 and 6 years old. They weren’t choosing this.
Caption: Traditional Polynesian head tattoos
which signify status in the culture.
No pontification on bodily modifications would be completely without discussion of intent. Intent is very important with body modifications. The aim to inflict pain on oneself would not be a body modification, but self mutilation, also, prohibited by the church. Pain is a side effect of many body modifications, but it can never be the goal.
The church clearly and vehemently protests and condemns mutilation and self-harm. Some have argued that tattoos are a form of mutilation, but the Catholic and English definition of mutilation is “an action which deprives oneself or another of a bodily organ or its use” or “altering the body in non-therapeutic ways that interfere with the body’s ability to function”. Tattooing in no way deprives the skin of its original function. It is still very much able to insulate, protect from the elements, and prevent the loss of body fluid via evaporation; therefore, this cannot constitute mutilation. It is an alteration, but not a mutilation, in the sense of the definition.
More to it, the church has a long standing tradition of individuals who have practiced corporal mortification, and while this does require extreme caution and sage spiritual guidance before attempting, it has never been outright condemned.
This brings us back to the intention of the modification, which will vary as many times as there are people who have them. My own tattoos serve to remind me of my devotion to my faith, my marriage vows, and the great struggle of my grandparents. They are deeply, powerful in my life, and I benefit greatly from them spiritually. They remind me of the permanence of my baptism and my marriage, and even serve as a conversation starter with other tattooed individuals. Many times this has opened a conversation about faith, where perhaps, a less decorated Catholic could not.
The steep rise in tattoos likely has other meanings, as well. They speak to the human need and desire for permanence in our lives. People are more afraid to tattoo one anothers’ names on their bodies, than they are to get married! This is a great tragedy, but demonstrates my point, well. We need permanence, and more and more people are not getting this permanence in their faith lives.
Body modifications, in some cases, can express the cultural loss of the intrinsic value of the human being, today. When the most perfect and beautiful are perceived most valuable, subliminally, we believe that if only we were more beautiful, more unique, more wonderful, then we would be valuable. The problem is, we are already of infinite value. Everyone one of us is the product of a desire for us, by our God. We can surely decorate or ornament our bodies in a way that is meaningful to us, but it can never change our value.
PLEASE LOOK FOR THE “This Catholic Life” PODCAST ON ITUNES, STITCHER OR BREADBOX MEDIA, DROPPING THIS WEEKEND, FOR COMMENTARY FROM THE CATHOLIC MAN SHOW HOSTS.
Many years ago people still knew what authentic masculinity meant. Men were men, and they weren’t accused of “toxic masculinity”. They grew up, they were accountable, they didn’t continue to live in their mom’s basements drinking mountain dew and gaming all night. Men had families and didn’t worry that children would cut into their ability to buy the latest, ironic, hipster, flannel shirt that makes them look like a lumberjack, despite the fact that they never go outdoors.
If you are unsure if what I say is true, the pictures will say all that needs to be said. We can see a desirable man from times past, and we can see the “new” desirable man, who looks like he may require more time to get ready for a date than I do.
I have decided, like every good blogger, to air my grievances on the interwebs, so without further ado, the signs of authentic masculinity:
The authentically masculine man doesn’t choose to continue to live with his parents and game until all hours of the night! He isn’t relying on his parents to allow him to continue to live like an overgrown child. He is industrious and seeks to make something of himself. This is not meant to shame those who have fallen on hard times, or those who are working toward independence. I mean to call out those who are quite happy being an adult child. If you’re actively working toward making something of yourself, that is manly, no matter where you are living!
The authentically masculine man doesn’t use your make-up and hair products. He grooms his hair and showers regularly. His clothes are not wrinkly and ill-fitting, because he has likely attracted a lovely woman who advises him. He knows how to dress-up for an event, especially mass, and that doesn’t include ironic sneakers with his dress pants. He is not vain, and embraces aging as something that makes him appear distinguished. Ask any woman. Salt and pepper hair is sexy! It says, a man has some wisdom, and the woman doesn’t have to worry about him stealing her hair dye.
The authentically masculine man would never put a woman’s reputation or soul at risk. He cares for her current and eternal well-being. This man can wait for marriage, or he has become convinced of its value later in life. He knows the value of patience and the message it sends to a woman, when he doesn’t try to use her.
The authentically masculine man does not order a “sex on the beach” with extra sugar on the rim and tiny umbrella garnish. He orders a scotch, neat. Ask Ron Swanson. Just Kidding. This is more about moderation. Real men know when they need to stop, and they know how to responsibly enjoy this gift from God.
God intended man to work the land, and for those of us who are not farmers, we can find many ways to commune with nature: yard work, fishing, hunting, sports, hiking, or, even, the romantic picnic date.
Children and Fertility:
The authentically masculine man does not want to completely avoid children, and he does not sterilize himself so that he can render the manliest part of himself, broken. He sees the gifts of life and the beauty of the fully open act of love between a husband and wife. He doesn’t want to use his wife for self gratification. He doesn’t think about the gaming systems or cars that he will have to sacrifice, or the time he may have to devote to his children. He is selfless enough to see what good children bring into the world and to welcome them with loving, fatherly arms. He is selfless enough to embrace his wife’s body, as it is, and not as he wants to poison it to be.
The authentically masculine man believes in God and respects and loves Him. He does not seek to live a nihilistic and hedonistic life, as he pleases. He leads prayer in his family, and displays good examples of living the faith to his friends, co-workers, and family. If he marries, he especially, leads his wife and children to God. He knows that his actions teach his children much more than his words, many times.
A monk once said that whining is immodest for a man because it displays less than they are, making them fall short of what God intended for man. Whining is self-emasculating and makes it appear as if a man feels he deserves less suffering in life. No one is above the master, and Jesus had quite a bit he could have whined about to his apostles, but can you imagine him griping to Peter about how ungrateful everyone is?
As I woman, I’ll be the first to say that we can whine at men a little, but it’s only because we love you. Married men live the longest out of any subset of men. Say thank you. Now, tell me I’m pretty. You’re welcome.
Somewhere along the line, a few men got the idea that being jerks or misogynists, was authentically masculine. This is not. It is a counterfeit, and not a good one. It’s like trying to pass of Monopoly money to a cashier. You don’t fool me. Authentically masculine men treat everyone with the dignity and respect due to another human being; they have manners. They don’t allow themselves to be walked all over because they have self-respect, but they aren’t out there saying demeaning things about other groups such as women or the poor. They are too good for that.
The authentically masculine man knows that others may depend on him and need him in their lives, especially if he is a father. He takes reasonable care of his body. He doesn’t go so far as to worship his appearance, but he maintains himself in a way that says he understands that he matters. He knows his children need a father. My own husband never exercised until we had children. Suddenly, someone depended on him, and he saw that he had to make sure he was going to be there. It’s responsible, it’s moral, and it’s masculine.
I hope this list rings true to you, but maybe it just ticked you off, royally. I apologize. It’s just my opinion. Close your computer, and pretend you didn’t read it. It’s a silly blog, written by some little woman with a superiority complex. 😃
This Catholic Life is definitely here to stay, at least for a while, so steps have been taken to much improve the sound quality of the guests and myself. The sound changes are effective starting in episode #11.
I hope if you had been irritated or displeased by the quality before, that you will give it another chance!
Thank you for all of the support and always feel free to write me at RosalieContrite@BreadBoxMedia.com
Search “This Catholic Life” on iTunes, Stitcher, Podomatic, and breadboxmedia.com